Jurisdiction Name: | Cleveland |
State/Province: | OH |
Country: | United States |
Type of Government: | Municipality |
Population: | 396,816 |
Population Range: | 1 million or more |
Policy Links: | Web – PDF |
Policy type: | resolution |
Year: | 2008 |
GFC Topic: | community food connections |
Keywords: | contracting, food contracting, food contracting policy, food economy, food procurement, food purchasing, food purchasing policy, institutional purchasing, local, local economy, local food, local food procurement, local food purchasing, pledge, procurement, purchasing, regional economy |
Adopting Government Department(s): | Cleveland City Council |
Lead Implementing Entity(s): | Cleveland City Council, Cleveland Office of Sustainability |
Support Entity(s): | Local Purchasing Working Group of the Food Policy Council |
Funding Amount: | |
Funding Sources: | |
Policy Outcome(s): | established a pledge by the City to incorporate local food purchasing into city food contracts (10% sourced from within 150 miles); led to the establishment of Ordinance No. 1660-A-09, which now mandates the City’s role in supporting the purchase of locally-produced food |
Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 |
Search Results for: L4M1 Valid Practice Questions 😐 Download L4M1 Pdf 🎷 Test L4M1 Assessment 🐂 Enter ➡ www.pdfvce.com ️⬅️ and search for ➠ L4M1 🠰 to download for free 🐦L4M1 Instant Download
Good Food Purchasing Program, Boston, Massachusetts
Jurisdiction Name: | Boston |
State/Province: | MA |
Country: | United States |
Type of Government: | Municipality |
Population: | 617,594 |
Population Range: | 250,000 to 999,999 |
Policy Links: | Web – PDF |
Policy type: | ordinance |
Year: | 2019 |
GFC Topic: | community food connections, community food production, community food security |
Keywords: | annual food procurement reporting, buy local, city agency food standards, economic investment, environmental sustainability, equitable, food procurement, food production, food purchasing, health, local economy, local food purchasing policy |
Adopting Government Department(s): | Boston City Council |
Lead Implementing Entity(s): | City of Boston departments and agencies |
Support Entity(s): | Boston Public Schools |
Funding Amount: | n/a |
Funding Sources: | n/a |
Policy Outcome(s): | The Good Food Purchasing Program, developed by the Center for Good Food Purchasing and implemented through an Ordinance Regarding Good Food Purchasing Standards in the City of Boston, requires the city (all city agencies, but primarily relevant to Boston Public Schools) to meet higher standards for nutrition, animal welfare, environmental sustainability and fair labor when making food purchases. The program seeks to bring greater transparency in the food purchasing process, to support support vendors that invest in disadvantaged and minority communities, to address ongoing inequities and issues caused by unequal access to resources in local minority, disabled, and/or women-owned businesses, and to boost the local economy while making a more equitable food system. |
Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 |
Garden Irrigation Fund, Funds Transfer
Jurisdiction Name: | Baltimore City |
State/Province: | MD |
Country: | United States |
Type of Government: | Municipality |
Population: | 620,961 |
Population Range: | 250,000 to 999,999 |
Policy Links: | |
Policy type: | funds transfer |
Year: | 2012 |
GFC Topic: | community food production |
Keywords: | agriculture, community garden, funding, grant, grant program, irrigation, public funds, urban, urban agriculture, water access |
Adopting Government Department(s): | Baltimore City Board of Estimates |
Lead Implementing Entity(s): | Parks & People Foundation |
Support Entity(s): | Baltimore City Department of Planning, Baltimore City Office of Sustainability, Baltimore City Department of Public Works, Baltimore Green Space |
Funding Amount: | $3000/garden site; $24,000 appropriated by Board of Estimates in 2012 as a transfer of funds |
Funding Sources: | |
Policy Outcome(s): | Established the Garden Irrigation Fund Program to provide up to $3,000 of support for the installation of direct lines into community garden sites in need of water access |
Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 |
Thunder Bay and Area Food Strategy, Thunder Bay Metropolitan Area, Ontario
Jurisdiction Name: | City of Thunder Bay; Municipality of Oliver Paipoonge; O'Conner Township; Township of Gillies; Municipality of Shuniah; Municipality of Neebing |
State/Province: | ON |
Country: | Canada |
Type of Government: | Regional Agency |
Population: | 121,621 |
Population Range: | 50,000 to 249,999 |
Policy Links: | Web – PDF |
Policy type: | plan |
Year: | 2014 |
GFC Topic: | community food connections, community food production, community food security |
Keywords: | agricultural economy, education, food access, food infrastructure, food procurement, food production, food security, food system, forest, freshwater foods, healthy food, local food, nutrition education, plan, regional, regional plan, school, school meal, urban agriculture |
Adopting Government Department(s): | Councils of City of Thunder Bay, Municipality of Oliver Paipoonge, O’Connor Township, Township of Gillies, Municipality of Shuniah, Conmee Township and the Municipality of Neebing |
Lead Implementing Entity(s): | Thunder Bay Food Coordinator, Steering Committee, and Administrative Committee |
Support Entity(s): | n/a |
Funding Amount: | n/a |
Funding Sources: | Ontario Trillium Foundation grant |
Policy Outcome(s): | Developed by various municipalities in the Thunder Bay Area, the strategy is a regionally-coordinated approach to identify areas of opportunity within the collective food system. Included are strategic points of focus that will contribute to the cultural, ecological, economic, and social health of the region, as well as to a more healthy and sustainable food system. Thus far, the strategy has been successful in increasing local food consumption and continuing the development of the food system through ongoing workshops, conferences, and publications. Pilot studies on increased local food access in institutions (schools, hospitals, etc.) and in community stadiums/arenas have also been completed. |
Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 |
BOH Resolution #8-12: Adopting the Recommendations of the King County Board of Health School Obesity Prevention Comittee
Jurisdiction Name: | King County |
State/Province: | WA |
Country: | United States |
Type of Government: | County |
Population: | 1,931,249 |
Population Range: | 1 million or more |
Policy Links: | Web – PDF |
Policy type: | resolution |
Year: | 2008 |
GFC Topic: | community food security |
Keywords: | community health, education, food access, food promotion, healthy eating, healthy food, healthy food access, obesity, plan, wellness program |
Adopting Government Department(s): | King County Board of Health |
Lead Implementing Entity(s): | Seattle and King County Public Health, Seattle Public Schools, Communities Putting Prevention to Work |
Support Entity(s): | Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Seattle Public Schools, |
Funding Amount: | $15.51 Million |
Funding Sources: | Center for Disease Control |
Policy Outcome(s): | This policy made way for the Public Health Department of Seattle and King County to implement a program to encourage healthy eating and active living behaviors. The municipality and county reached 1.9 million residents with media, environmental changes, programs and policies that made healthy choices easier. This included assistance with master planning, working with the Seattle Public Schools to change nutrition standards and physical activity, farm to table initiatives, and community health. Through a competitive process, Seattle and King County awarded 55 grants totaling $8.9 Million to schools, local governments, and community organizations, 41 of which went to obesity prevention measures. The evaluation concluded that childhood obesity has declined since the beginning of the project. |
Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 – Link 2 |
Greenworks Philadelphia
Jurisdiction Name: | Philadelphia |
State/Province: | PA |
Country: | United States |
Type of Government: | Municipality |
Population: | 1,526,006 |
Population Range: | 1 million or more |
Policy Links: | Web – PDF |
Policy type: | plan |
Year: | 2009 |
GFC Topic: | community food connections, community food production, community food security |
Keywords: | access, affordability, buy local, community garden, farmers market, food access, food infrastructure, food procurement, food retail, food security, food system, greenworks, greenworks philadelphia, health, healthy eating, healthy food, infrastructure, local, local food, locally grown, plan, procurement, retail, sustainability, sustainability plan |
Adopting Government Department(s): | Philadelphia City Council |
Lead Implementing Entity(s): | Philadelphia Mayor |
Support Entity(s): | n/a |
Funding Amount: | Approximately $150,000 and one full time, two part time and a consulting firm over 9 months |
Funding Sources: | William Penn Foundation |
Policy Outcome(s): | Greenworks Philadelphia is the city’s sustainability plan. The plan’s main objective is to make the city of Philadelphia the “greenest city of America”. It contains over 160 initiatives and progress on the plan has been reported annually since its publication in 2009. |
Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 – Link 2 |
Food Policy Council Establishment Resolution
Jurisdiction Name: | Cabarrus County |
State/Province: | NC |
Country: | United States |
Type of Government: | County |
Population: | 184,498 |
Population Range: | 50,000 to 249,999 |
Policy Links: | Web – PDF |
Policy type: | resolution |
Year: | 2010 |
GFC Topic: | community food connections |
Keywords: | agriculture, buy local, community garden, economic development, food policy council, food system, health, kannapolis demonstration garden, local, local food, locally grown marketing campaign, marketing, public funds, sustainability, sustainable |
Adopting Government Department(s): | Cabarrus County Board of Commissioners |
Lead Implementing Entity(s): | n/a |
Support Entity(s): | n/a |
Funding Amount: | $7,000/yr |
Funding Sources: | Cabarrus County |
Policy Outcome(s): | resolution established the Cabarrus County Food Policy County; the Food Policy Council developed as an outcome of the Central Area planning process; led and funded the creation of the Locally Grown Marketing Campaign – http://www.cabarrusfpc.org/eat-local/locally-grown-campaign/; spearheaded the Kannapolis Demonstration Garden project – http://www.cabarrusfpc.org/local-food-projects/community-gardens/ |
Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 – Link 2 |
Local Food Action Initiative, Resolution No. 31019
Jurisdiction Name: | Seattle |
State/Province: | WA |
Country: | United States |
Type of Government: | Municipality |
Population: | 634,535 |
Population Range: | 250,000 to 999,999 |
Policy Links: | Web – PDF |
Policy type: | resolution |
Year: | 2008 |
GFC Topic: | community food connections |
Keywords: | community kitchen, coordination, disparities, distribution, food distribution, food policy advisor position, food procurement, food recovery, food system, framework, healthy food, interdepartmental food systems team, local, local food, low-income, policy framework, procurement, recovery, regional, staff position, staffing, sustainability |
Adopting Government Department(s): | Seattle City Council |
Lead Implementing Entity(s): | Office of Sustainability and Environment |
Support Entity(s): | n/a |
Funding Amount: | not applicable |
Funding Sources: | not applicable |
Policy Outcome(s): | established a policy framework and identified specific actions to strengthen Seattle and the region |
Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 – Link 2 |
Composting in Chicago, Ordinance No. 7-28-715
Jurisdiction Name: | Chicago |
State/Province: | IL |
Country: | United States |
Type of Government: | Municipality |
Population: | 2,695,598 |
Population Range: | 1 million or more |
Policy Links: | Web – PDF |
Policy type: | ordinance |
Year: | 2007 |
GFC Topic: | community food production |
Keywords: | compost, composting, urban agriculture |
Adopting Government Department(s): | Chicago City Council |
Lead Implementing Entity(s): | Department of Streets and Sanitation |
Support Entity(s): | n/a |
Funding Amount: | n/a |
Funding Sources: | n/a |
Policy Outcome(s): | This ordinance allows small-scale compost operations at homes with specific requirements on size, odor, pest control, mixing, moisture level, sewage restrictions, and operational provisions. It requires a permit for operations larger than a specific size as outlined by the Department of Streets and Sanitation. |
Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 |
Creating a Food Security Task Force, Ordinance No. 206-05
Jurisdiction Name: | San Francisco City and County |
State/Province: | CA |
Country: | United States |
Type of Government: | Municipality/County |
Population: | 827,420 |
Population Range: | 250,000 to 999,999 |
Policy Links: | Web – PDF |
Policy type: | ordinance |
Year: | 2005 |
GFC Topic: | community food security |
Keywords: | SNAP, WIC, culturally appropriate, food assistance, food security, food security task force, low-income, plan, strategic, strategic plan, task force, vulnerable population |
Adopting Government Department(s): | City and County of San Francisco Board of Supervisors |
Lead Implementing Entity(s): | San Francisco Department of Public Health |
Support Entity(s): | San Francisco Unified School District, San Francisco Human Service Agency, San Francisco Department of Children, Youth and their Families, San Francisco Mayor's Office on Community Development, San Francisco Recreation and Park Department |
Funding Amount: | |
Funding Sources: | |
Policy Outcome(s): | established a Food Security Task Force (FSTF); defined food security; required the creation of a strategic plan to reduce hunger and increase food security and participation in food assistance programs; required FSTF to submit status reports regarding the strategic plan progress; included a sunset provision for FSTF to recommend whether the task force should continue after two years of this ordinance adoption |
Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 |