| Jurisdiction Name: | San Francisco City and County |
| State/Province: | CA |
| Country: | United States |
| Type of Government: | Municipality/County |
| Population: | 827,420 |
| Population Range: | 250,000 to 999,999 |
| Policy Links: | Web – PDF |
| Policy type: | ordinance |
| Year: | 2010 |
| GFC Topic: | community food production |
| Keywords: | agriculture, food production, irrigation, maximum applied water allowance, production, urban, urban agriculture, water, water allowance, water budget, water conservation, water efficient irrigation ordinance |
| Adopting Government Department(s): | City and County of San Francisco Board of Supervisors |
| Lead Implementing Entity(s): | San Francisco Public Utilities Commission |
| Support Entity(s): | n/a |
| Funding Amount: | |
| Funding Sources: | |
| Policy Outcome(s): | California State Water Conservation in Landscaping Act (Assembly Bill 1881) required all communities to adopt ordinances that regulate landscape irrigation practices and plant use; ordinance amended San Francisco Administrative Code to comply with mandate; requires that landscape projects (including some urban agriculture projects meeting specific criteria) be installed, constructed, operated, and maintained in accordance with rules adopted by the SFPUC that establish a water budget (maximum applied water allowance) for outdoor water consumption |
| Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 |
Search Results for: L4M1 Valid Practice Questions 😐 Download L4M1 Pdf 🎷 Test L4M1 Assessment 🐂 Enter ➡ www.pdfvce.com ️⬅️ and search for ➠ L4M1 🠰 to download for free 🐦L4M1 Instant Download
Greensboro Fresh Food Action Plan, Greensboro, North Carolina
| Jurisdiction Name: | Greensboro |
| State/Province: | NC |
| Country: | United States |
| Type of Government: | Municipality |
| Population: | 284,816 |
| Population Range: | 250,000 to 999,999 |
| Policy Links: | Web – PDF |
| Policy type: | plan |
| Year: | 2015 |
| GFC Topic: | community food connections, community food production, community food security |
| Keywords: | SNAP, aggregation, agribusiness, agricultural practices, agriculture, city, community, community garden, corner store, county, farm, food access, food hub, grocery store, healthy, local, local food system, plan, retail, urban |
| Adopting Government Department(s): | Greensboro City Council |
| Lead Implementing Entity(s): | City of Greensboro |
| Support Entity(s): | Guilford County Cooperative Extension Office; Greensboro Farmers Market; Out of the Garden Project; University of North Carolina at Greensboro |
| Funding Amount: | One-time grant of $470,000 to help implementation of the Greensboro Fresh Food Access Plan |
| Funding Sources: | US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Local Food Promotion Program (LFPP) |
| Policy Outcome(s): | Funded by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Local Food Promotion Program (LFPP), this plan set goals to increase retail access to fresh, local produce, and to strengthen the local food system in Greensboro. In order to meet these goals, the Greensboro Fresh Food Action Plan offers three comprehensive strategies: (1) improve retail access to fresh local foods in neighborhoods through community efforts and initiatives; (2) expand existing local food business enterprises; and (3) create new local food business enterprises that address identified gaps in food access. Based on findings from interviews and surveys of residents, businesses, and food system stakeholders, the plan’s recommendations and analyses were compiled to supplement pre-existing community efforts and to address issues related to food access. Some key recommendations are to conduct a Know your Farmer education and outreach campaign to bring awareness to locally available fresh foods, to establish a Food Hub in order to narrow the gap in local food access, to build and sustain relationships between producers, distributors, and customers in effort to create a sustainable market demand for local fresh foods in Greensboro, and several other tangible suggestions. The City of Greensboro offers these recommendations as opportunities of optional participation and encourage public engagement and formation of partnerships amid implementation. The plan was adopted by the Greensboro City Council in 2015. |
| Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 |
Urban Agriculture Zoning Ordinance No. 66-11
| Jurisdiction Name: | San Francisco City and County |
| State/Province: | CA |
| Country: | United States |
| Type of Government: | Municipality/County |
| Population: | 827,420 |
| Population Range: | 250,000 to 999,999 |
| Policy Links: | Web – PDF |
| Policy type: | ordinance |
| Year: | 2011 |
| GFC Topic: | community food production |
| Keywords: | agriculture, food production, production, urban, urban agriculture, zoning |
| Adopting Government Department(s): | City and County of San Francisco Board of Supervisors |
| Lead Implementing Entity(s): | San Francisco Planning Department |
| Support Entity(s): | n/a |
| Funding Amount: | |
| Funding Sources: | |
| Policy Outcome(s): | amended San Francisco Municipal Code to update controls related to urban agricultural uses by defining urban agriculture, including neighborhood agriculture and large-scale urban agriculture, and amending sections to regulate agricultural uses in various zoning districts |
| Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 |
Backyard Chickens Policy, Ordinance No. 8378
| Jurisdiction Name: | Lawrence |
| State/Province: | KS |
| Country: | United States |
| Type of Government: | Municipality |
| Population: | 89,512 |
| Population Range: | 50,000 to 249,999 |
| Policy Links: | Web |
| Policy type: | ordinance |
| Year: | 2009 |
| GFC Topic: | community food production |
| Keywords: | agriculture, backyard chickens, food production, fowl, production, urban, urban agriculture |
| Adopting Government Department(s): | Lawrence City Commission |
| Lead Implementing Entity(s): | |
| Support Entity(s): | n/a |
| Funding Amount: | not applicable |
| Funding Sources: | not applicable |
| Policy Outcome(s): | amended code of the City of Lawrence to allow the raising of fowl on residential property |
| Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 – Link 2 |
San Francisco Unified School District, Proposition A Bond Program
| Jurisdiction Name: | San Francisco |
| State/Province: | CA |
| Country: | United States |
| Type of Government: | Municipality |
| Population: | 805,235 |
| Population Range: | 250,000 to 999,999 |
| Policy Links: | |
| Policy type: | bond |
| Year: | 2003 |
| GFC Topic: | community food connections, community food production |
| Keywords: | agriculture, children, community garden, education, farming, food production, fruits, healthy choices, healthy eating, public funds, school, small-scale farming, urban, urban agriculture, vegetables |
| Adopting Government Department(s): | San Francisco Unified School District |
| Lead Implementing Entity(s): | San Francisco Unified School District |
| Support Entity(s): | Education Outside |
| Funding Amount: | $2,000,000 |
| Funding Sources: | San Francisco Unified School District, State of California |
| Policy Outcome(s): | Established funds for incorporating green design opportunities in the play areas of certain District schools, including schoolyard gardens. Part of the larger $295 million bond referendum was used to modernize educational facilities. |
| Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 – Link 2 |
Sowing the Seeds for Southtowns Agribusiness
| Jurisdiction Name: | Southtowns of Erie County |
| State/Province: | NY |
| Country: | United States |
| Type of Government: | Regional Agency |
| Population: | 919,040 |
| Population Range: | 1 million or more |
| Policy Links: | |
| Policy type: | plan |
| Year: | 2009 |
| GFC Topic: | community food production |
| Keywords: | agriculture, agritourism, economic development, farm, food production, plan, production, rural, rural agriculture, southtowns farm trail, tourism |
| Adopting Government Department(s): | Southtowns Community Enhancement Coalition |
| Lead Implementing Entity(s): | Southtowns Community Enhancement Coalition |
| Support Entity(s): | University at Buffalo Regional Institute |
| Funding Amount: | not available |
| Funding Sources: | municipal membership fees to the Southtowns Community Enhancement Coalition, fundraising, grants |
| Policy Outcome(s): | Plan resulted in the development of the Southtowns Farm Trail |
| Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 – Link 2 – Link 3 |
Residential Sales Ordinance, Denver, Colorado
| Jurisdiction Name: | Denver |
| State/Province: | CO |
| Country: | United States |
| Type of Government: | Municipality/County |
| Population: | 600,158 |
| Population Range: | 250,000 to 999,999 |
| Policy Links: | Web |
| Policy type: | ordinance |
| Year: | 2014 |
| GFC Topic: | community food connections, community food production, community food security |
| Keywords: | economic development, food access, fresh produce, healthy food, permit, zoning ordinance |
| Adopting Government Department(s): | Denver City Council |
| Lead Implementing Entity(s): | Denver Department of Community Planning and Development: Development Services/Zoning |
| Support Entity(s): | n/a |
| Funding Amount: | n/a |
| Funding Sources: | n/a |
| Policy Outcome(s): | The ordinance is an amendment to the Denver Zoning Code that allows city residents to sell fresh produce, eggs and ‘cottage foods’ (e.g., spices, teas, honey, jam) that residents grow or make themselves from their home. The resident requires a zoning permit and a food safety course but has new opportunities for supplemental earnings that can result in better economic and health circumstances. Residents have an income ceiling of $5,000 annually. The amendment was developed by the Denver Sustainable Food Policy Council. The intended goal of this policy is to reduce the distance the food travels from food to table and provide supplemental income opportunities for families seeking greater economic self-sufficiency. |
| Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 |
Baltimore Sustainability Plan, Ordinance No. 09-141
| Jurisdiction Name: | Baltimore City |
| State/Province: | MD |
| Country: | United States |
| Type of Government: | Municipality |
| Population: | 620,961 |
| Population Range: | 250,000 to 999,999 |
| Policy Links: | |
| Policy type: | ordinance |
| Year: | 2009 |
| GFC Topic: | community food connections, community food production, community food security |
| Keywords: | access, affordability, agriculture, buy local, consumption, food access, food consumption, food marketing, food production, food system, healthy, healthy eating, healthy food, institution, land use, local, local food, marketing, production, school, urban, urban agriculture, water |
| Adopting Government Department(s): | Baltimore City Council |
| Lead Implementing Entity(s): | Baltimore Office of Sustainability |
| Support Entity(s): | |
| Funding Amount: | |
| Funding Sources: | |
| Policy Outcome(s): | plan incorporated food system goals and recommendations related to urban agriculture, food availability, food access, local food procurement, and local/regional food data; helped lead to a number of programs and initiatives such as the Land Leasing Initiative, Baltimore Food Policy Initiative, Power in Dirt Initiative, Future Harvest-CASA Beginner Farmer Training Program, Baltimarket, and Baltimore Climate Action Plan |
| Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 |
City of Seattle Comprehensive Plan
| Jurisdiction Name: | Seattle |
| State/Province: | WA |
| Country: | United States |
| Type of Government: | Municipality |
| Population: | 634,535 |
| Population Range: | 250,000 to 999,999 |
| Policy Links: | Web – PDF |
| Policy type: | plan |
| Year: | 2014 |
| GFC Topic: | community food connections, community food security |
| Keywords: | access, affordability, affordable, community garden, comprehensive plan, food access, food affordability, food production, food system, healthy, healthy food, low-income, production |
| Adopting Government Department(s): | Seattle City Council |
| Lead Implementing Entity(s): | City of Seattle Department of Planning & Development |
| Support Entity(s): | n/a |
| Funding Amount: | not applicable |
| Funding Sources: | not applicable |
| Policy Outcome(s): | food systems concepts are represented in Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan (see Human Development Element Goal HDG3.5); plan provides an enabling framework for food systems policies and programs; most recent amendment to plan approved in 2014 |
| Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 |
Urban Agriculture Zoning Regulations, Ordinance No. 123378
| Jurisdiction Name: | Seattle |
| State/Province: | WA |
| Country: | United States |
| Type of Government: | Municipality |
| Population: | 634,535 |
| Population Range: | 250,000 to 999,999 |
| Policy Links: | Web – PDF |
| Policy type: | ordinance |
| Year: | 2010 |
| GFC Topic: | community food production |
| Keywords: | agriculture, backyard chickens, chickens, community garden, farm, farmers market, food production, food sales, land use, land use code, production, rooftop, rooftop garden, urban, urban agriculture, urban farm, zoning, zoning ordinance |
| Adopting Government Department(s): | Seattle City Council |
| Lead Implementing Entity(s): | Seattle Department of Planning and Development |
| Support Entity(s): | n/a |
| Funding Amount: | |
| Funding Sources: | |
| Policy Outcome(s): | ordinance amended the city’s land use code to expand opportunities for urban agriculture (Sections 23.40.002, 23.42.052, 23.43.006, 23.43.040, 23.44.006, 23.44.040, 23.45.504, 23.45.506, 23.45.508, 23.45.514, 23.45.545, 23.47A.004, 23.47A.011, 23.47A.012, 23.48.010, 23.49.008, 23.50.012, 23.50.020, 23.54.015, 23.84A.002, 23.84A.014, and 23.84A.036; adding new sections to Chapters 23.42 and 23.44; and amending the title of subchapter II of Chapter 23.44); code changes provide increased opportunities to grow and sell food in all zones; code changes allow “urban farms” and “community gardens” in all zones, with some limitations in industrial zones; allow residents to sell food grown on their property; formally recognize farmer’s markets and allow them in more Seattle areas; allow dedicated food production on rooftop greenhouses with a 15-foot exemption to height limits in a variety of higher density zones |
| Additional Resources and Information: | Link 1 – Link 2 |